Hair is this kind of emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we wish we can’t have and what we’ve we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we wish straight, straight hair and we wish curly, brunette and we wish blonde, blonde and we wish red. Likewise upper lip hair on women, so valued as an indicator of exquisite beauty using elements of the entire world, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is a common problem affecting nearly all women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the utilization of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it’s often followed closely by feelings of poor self esteem, a sense of isolation and low self worth.
Considering that the occasions when bearded feamales in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to eliminate any trace of hair from any and every part of these body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it’s not just women that are now affected… increasingly the male gender is susceptible to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair can be in the same way vilified by the male population nowadays since the female.
Different Ways of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth can be caused by many factors, such as for example, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the sole permanent approach to hair removal, is a treatment that is in great demand by female and transsexual clients and recently, as a result of society’s attitudes, the number of male clients is increasing.
To generally meet this need there as always been many hair removal measures some of which go back centuries in history. Hair removal has existed since caveman times but interestingly the elements of the human body we are removing hair from have differed over the ages. Removing hair from the pinnacle and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but for survival. There’s evidence that cavemen did this but in addition the ancient Egyptians and it had been undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the pinnacle would take away the benefit of an adversary having anything to grab onto as well as having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. Actually these women removed most of these body hair, aside from eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It absolutely was also considered uncivilized for guys to have hair on the face. Facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of an individual of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a form of razors made from flint or bronze since the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
In addition they used a method of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) could be placed on your skin, a strip of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – the equivalent of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There was also another technique used called threading which is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn could be placed through the fingers of both hands, and quickly stroked over the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. During the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of these eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads in order to give the looks of an extended brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to notice well-known influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the very beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are all temporary methods that numerous people try today. Actually new hair removal devices seem to look like buses – every 20 minutes or so! However, technology has moved on and with it, it seems that there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods are in a restricted category as the former has been banned in some countries just like the USA and the latter are just in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are a few of the doubtful methods in that there surely is no established data on the effectiveness.
Electrolysis continues to be the sole proven permanent approach to hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited out of this tried and trusted treatment. It is usually the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a dramatic transformation within their clients, from a timid, introverted personality in the beginning of a program of treatments, to a comfortable and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ inside our Western society is a multiple million pound industry. Such a huge money making machine though may have more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none of which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are generally permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this specific at heart there is only one system on the market today that can totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that is electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It remains utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a medical facility laser hair removal departments. It can be considered an essential tool in the job of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It offers cosmetic relief for the buyer with mild hirsute problems to the in-patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require several hours of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the language ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached that when the hairs that have been removed do 激光脫毛優惠 not grow back for an amount of twelve months after the last treatment, permanent reduction can be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains even today, the one method legally permitted to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as for example LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, it’s now realised, reaches best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The reality is that this is wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ tend to be more realistic. The reality is that whilst they’ve their successes there is also their limitations – they can not treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ although not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The reality is this newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it just simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not most of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The rest of the 5% – 15% hair will soon be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but still stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the sole option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down seriously to additional electrolysis treatment to perform the job. Laser and IPL are now actually recognised to be a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators use a burst of filtered light aimed at one hair at a time. After the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light utilized in the unit is targeted contrary to the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. Allow this technique, fibre-optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through that the light was flashed. There’s no clinical data published up to now to guide any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method using its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was initially patented in 1959. This method functions by passing an electric current through the tweezers, which holds the hair on the surface of your skin by grasping them for several minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations since the claim of electricity destroying the root of the hair does not have any scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published currently to establish the claim that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the utilization of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches instead of cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the thought of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the utilization of a needle. A DC electric current is passed through a conductive gel on the surface of your skin via an adhesive patch placed on the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the electric current that travels down seriously to the hair follicle.
To date no clinical data can be obtained and the laws of physics do not support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair doesn’t conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it will spread along the surface of your skin rather than passing through the hair. Therefore, as with the tweezer method, the argument that it will reach the root of the hair to destroy it does not have any scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the process they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and do not dissipate into your skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to be the ‘next generation of long haul hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it’s ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in exactly the same follicle proving that this is a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA hasn’t given the results currently regarding an application to promote in April 2010 of the most recent device.